Readers report symptoms like staring at a paragraph, feeling the term is familiar yet inexplicable, and abandoning the article after a few sentences. The confusion shows up as mis‑used vocabulary, unnecessary Googling, and a lingering sense that the content is deliberately opaque. This friction erodes trust in the author and discourages deeper learning, turning what could be a valuable insight into a dead end.
The root cause lies in three overlapping gaps: first, Irving often assumes prior exposure to niche hardware concepts; second, his definitions omit practical examples that anchor abstract ideas; third, he intermixes acronyms without a consistent expansion strategy. When readers lack any of these anchors, the terminology floats without a reference point, leading to the symptom pattern described above in future reading sessions.